Management of oculo-orbital complications of odontogenic sinusitis in adults.

Introduction: Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis (OMS) is an infectious inflammatory pathology caused by a dental condition. Considering the anatomical relations with the orbit, maxillary sinus infection can easily spread, evolving into severe oculo-orbital complications that can sometimes be life-threatening. Material and methods: We performed a retrospective study of over 2 years, examining the data of 18 patients diagnosed with OMS with oculo-orbital complications. The patients were evaluated regarding their dental history, symptoms, clinical and endoscopic findings, ophthalmologic evaluation, bacteriologic tests, computed tomography (CT) imaging, medical and surgical treatment, and outcomes. Results: The age of the patients was between 24 and 65 years old with an almost equal gender distribution: 10 female and 8 male patients. From the total, 7 patients had type II diabetes, 2 of whom were insulin-dependent, 1 patient had thrombophilia and 2 patients had renal failure with peritoneal dialysis. Regarding the type of oculo-orbital complications, 10 patients were diagnosed with preseptal cellulitis and 8 with orbital cellulitis. Just 5 patients with orbital cellulitis required surgical treatment and orbitotomy was performed, followed by endonasal endoscopic drainage. The evolution after surgical treatment was favorable for all operated patients. Discussions: Oculo-orbital complications of OMS are typically more severe than those of rhinogenic sinusitis because anaerobic bacteria are involved. Immunosuppression represents a favorable environment for the development of OMS and its complications, diabetes being the most common risk factor. A negative prognostic feature is the appearance of ophthalmological symptoms in both eyes, so visual function may be reduced. The treatment of oculo-orbital complications of OMS is urgent and depends on a broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy associated or not with surgical intervention. Conclusions: The diagnosis of oculo-orbital complications of OMS is complex and requires clinical experience as well as extensive medical knowledge to treat both the cause and the consequences of the conditions quickly and effectively. The proper management of oculo-orbital complications is based on a multidisciplinary team: ophthalmology, ENT, dentistry, imaging, and laboratory. Abbreviations: OMS = odontogenic maxillary sinusitis, CT = computed tomography, ENT = ear-nose-throat, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, HNS = head and neck surgery.

[Maxillary sinusitis as a complication of dental implants placement: a case report]. / Verkhnechelyustnoi sinusit kak oslozhnenie dental'noi implantatsii: sluchai iz praktiki.

The article presents a case of chronic odontogenic maxillary sinusitis and the results of its surgical treatment. The cause of the sinusitis, confirmed by the results of X-ray and pathohistological studies, was an inflammatory process affecting the bone tissue around the implant, installed in the place of the upper first molar which was accompanied by the development of an oroantral fistula. During the surgical intervention, the communication between the oral cavity and the maxillary sinus was eliminated, and the implant with the abutment, which was entirely in its cavity, was also removed.

Chronic maxillary sinusitis in palaeopathology: A review of methods.

OBJECTIVE: This study reviews the palaeopathological literature discussing maxillary sinusitis to examine current trends and issues within the study of this condition, and to make recommendations for future research in this area. MATERIALS: Seventy-five studies were identified through a literature search of digital and physical sources. METHODS: Information regarding study metadata, the populations investigated, sinusitis diagnostic criteria, and sinusitis prevalence was examined. RESULTS: Populations from the UK and Europe were the most studied, reflecting both palaeopathology's systemic colonialism and academic legacies. Most studies used diagnostic criteria published in the mid-1990s, with some subsequent studies modifying these criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic criteria from 1995 are widely used but do not include all possible bone changes seen within sinusitis. There is also a need for researchers to engage in issues of data reductionism when using descriptive categories for archaeological sites and populations. SIGNIFICANCE: This paper provides considerations as to how the 1995 diagnostic criteria may be revised by future researchers and synthesises much of the published sinusitis prevalence data to assist researchers interested in the palaeopathology of respiratory disease. LIMITATIONS: More general osteological research, which includes palaeopathological information, was likely missed from this review due to the choice of key terms and languages used in the literature search. SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: Additional research into sinusitis in archaeological populations outside of Western Europe is required. Further work examining the ability to compare pathological data from macroscopic observation and medical imaging would be advantageous to palaeopathology as a whole.

[Dynamic indicators of the use of puncture method for the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis in healthcare institutions of the city of Moscow]. / Dinamicheskie pokazateli primeneniya punktsionnogo metoda lecheniya ostrogo verkhnechelyustnogo sinusita v uchrezhdeniyakh zdravookhraneniya goroda Moskvy.

According to the statistical forms medical and preventive treatment centres (MPTC), the analysis of dynamic indicators of the treatment of patients with acute sinusitis (AS) in outpatient polyclinic centers (OPC) and ENT hospitals in Moscow for the period from 2017 to 2021 was carried out. The total number of visits to an otorhinolaryngologist in the OPC in Moscow for 2017-2021 amounted to 6 834 952 patients, including 245 172 patients with AS (3.6%).The total number of hospitalizations in the departments of otorhinolaryngology for the same period amounted to 184 735 patients, including 12 906 patients with AS (7%).The number of patients with AS who was consulted by an otorhinolaryngologist from 2017 to 2021 decreased by 18.2%, which can be explained by a change in the routing of patients with mild form of AS to general practitioners. An analysis of the dynamic indicators of maxillary sinus punctures carried out in the medical and preventive treatment centres (MPTC) in Moscow during the period from 2017 to 2021 showed that there was a redistribution of this manipulation from ENT hospitals to the OPC. At the same time, the proportion of patients requiring puncture treatment in the OPC for 2017-2019 was stable and amounted to 9.3%. However, since 2020, there has been an increase in this indicator by more than 2 times (21.7%), which probably indicates an increase in the treatment of patients with moderate forms of AS in the OPC. The frequency of maxillary sinus punctures that were performed in ENT hospitals in 2017-2019 amounted to 83.5%, in 2020-2021 decreased to 63.4%. The average number of maxillary sinus punctures per patient in ENT hospitals from 2017 to 2019 was 13.3. Since 2020, this value has decreased by about 2 times and has become equal to 8.5. The decrease in the number of maxillary sinus punctures that were performed in ENT hospitals is probably due to the fact that patients with severe and complicated forms of acute sinusitis hospitalized from 2020 to 2021 required more radical surgical treatment.

Sinus culture differences in patients with radiographic evidence of odontogenic disease.

PURPOSE: Odontogenic sinusitis is a well-known entity with a different pathogenesis than chronic rhinosinusitis. Nonspecific symptoms can make diagnosis difficult. This study aims to compare culture results between patients with and without computed tomography findings indicative of possible odontogenic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in which patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic sinusitis over a three-year period at a single institution were reviewed. CT imaging was reviewed for evidence of dental disease, specifically periapical lucency, dehiscence of the floor of the maxillary sinus, oroantral fistula, or foreign body. Culture results were then assessed and compared between groups with CT evidence of a possible odontogenic source to those without. RESULTS: Overall, 231 patients were evaluated. 92 patients (39.8 %) were found to have evidence of a likely odontogenic source on CT. Cultures were available for 118 of 231 patients (51.1 %). Patients with CT signs of odontogenic disease were significantly more likely to grow Proteus mirabilis (p = 0.018) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (p = 0.037) on culture. Patients without CT signs of odontogenic sources were significantly more likely to grow Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p = 0.009). Of note, patients with CT findings concerning for an odontogenic source were also more likely to grow fungi other than Aspergillus and Mucor species on culture (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Patients with CT findings concerning for an odontogenic source of sinus disease showed differences in culture results that could be important in differentiating pathogenesis of sinus disease.

Do Symptoms Correlate with the Signs in Odontogenic Sinusitis with Periapical Lesions?

INTRODUCTION: Endodontic pathology is one of the most common causes of odontogenic sinusitis, and its evaluation is challenging. Omission of periapical lesions in diagnostic process leads to recurrent sinusitis after cessation of medical therapy. METHODS: Sixty-one symptomatic patients presented with odontogenic sinusitis with periapical lesions of teeth adjacent to the maxillary sinus were included in the study. Symptoms evaluated with SNOT-22 and OHIP-14 questionnaires were compared to signs during endoscopic and radiological evaluation. RESULTS: Coexistence of odontogenic sinusitis with nasal polyps significantly decreases the quality of life, especially concerning the emotional domain (p = 0.047). Patency of ostiomeatal corresponds well with the severity of sinonasal symptoms reported with SNOT-22 (p = 0.051). Extent of maxillary sinus opacifications scored with Zinreich scale correlates positively with the presence of discharge (p = 0.001) and edema (p = 0.072) in the endoscopic Lund-Kennedy scale. Among 67 teeth with periapical lesions, 73.1% had undergone previous root canal treatment, but in 47.8% of cases, it was defined as incomplete. Endodontic status did not affect the severity of patient's complaints. CONCLUSION: In case of odontogenic sinusitis of endodontic origin, endoscopic signs correlate better than radiological with the self-reported symptoms. In order to better evaluate the severity of the disease and possible need of surgical intervention, both otolaryngologists and dental specialists should focus on extent of inflammatory lesions in the maxillary sinus.

Inflammatory endotype of odontogenic sinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is distinct from non-odontogenic rhinosinusitis with regard to clinical features as well as diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. While numerous studies have explored immune profiles of chronic rhinosinusitis, very few studies have explored the inflammatory endotype of ODS. METHODS: Odontogenic sinusitis was diagnosed by confirming infectious sinusitis adjacent to infectious maxillary odontogenic pathology. Maxillary sinus cultures and mucosal biopsies were obtained during endoscopic endonasal surgery in ODS and control patients. Controls were patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery with no sinus disease. Specimens were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. Analysis was performed using a multiplex assay to measure Th-1 (TNFα, IFNγ, IL-2,12,18), Th-2 (IL-4,5,9,13), Th-17 (IL-17A,17F,22), and innate (CCL5,CXCL9,CXCL10, IL-6,8,10,12,23,27) immune pathways. Groups were compared via independent sample t-tests; if assumptions were violated, nonparametric Wilcoxon ranked sum tests were performed. RESULTS: Specimens from 22 ODS patients were compared to nine controls. ODS mucosal tissue was sampled in the setting of the following dental pathologies: post-dental extraction (n = 15), untreated apical periodontitis (n = 2), apical periodontitis after root canal therapy (n = 2), and maxillary sinus bone grafting with or without dental implantation (n = 3). The following cytokines were significantly elevated in ODS compared to controls: IFNγ, TNFα, IL-6, 8, 10, 27, and CXCL9. IL-17 levels were similar in both ODS and controls. Therefore, ODS demonstrated heightened innate and Th1 immune activity. CONCLUSION: ODS demonstrated both innate immune and Th1 inflammatory endotypes. Further studies are needed to explore ODS immunopathobiology and its potential impact on ODS management.

Unilateral, Rostral Maxillary Sinusitis Resulting from Displacement and Retention of an Alveolar Plug in a 4-Year-Old Horse.

Sinusitis is a common occurrence in horses and often develops secondary to dental disease. Extraction of cheek teeth in horses is associated with variable degrees of complications and although postoperative displacement and retention of alveolar plugs has been identified as one such potential complication, few cases of resulting sinusitis have been reported. This manuscript describes a four-year-old Thoroughbred mare that was presented for chronic unilateral left-sided mucopurulent nasal discharge after extraction of the left maxillary second molar tooth two months earlier. Radiographic and computed tomographic (CT) examinations revealed a well circumscribed, soft tissue opacity in the left rostral sinus compartment. Intraoral examination revealed feed impacted in the alveolus of the extracted tooth and an oral sinus fistula. Upper airway endoscopy showed thick, purulent material at the nasomaxillary aperture. Sinoscopy showed unexpectedly clean frontal, dorsal conchal and caudal maxillary sinuses. The alveolar dental plug associated with previous exodontia became apparent within the sinus and was removed through the sinoscopy portal. Repeat endoscopies confirmed progressive clearance of the sinusitis during hospitalization. Unilateral nasal discharge returned three months later. An abscess within the sinus had formed. Complete resolution of the sinusitis was achieved after lancing the abscess and further sinus lavage. Sinoscopy through a frontal sinus trephination portal proved useful in diagnosis and treatment. Detailed evaluation of structures allowed for rapid establishment of adequate drainage and communication between all sinus compartments without osteoplastic surgery.

[The development of posttraumatic maxillary sinusitis due to transconjunctival penetration of a foreign body with a fracture of the lower wall of the orbit]. / Razvitie posttravmaticheskogo verkhnechelyustnogo sinusita vsledstvie transkon"yunktival'nogo proniknoveniya inorodnogo tela s perelomom nizhnei stenki orbity.

The article presents a clinical example of the course of posttraumatic acute purulent sinusitis with reactive soft tissue phenomena due to the previous injury of the orbit by a foreign body, the introduction of the latter into orbit and the maxillary sinus result in a fracture of the lower wall of the orbit. A feature of the injury is the penetration of a foreign body through the conjunctiva of the lower eyelid and lower conjunctival fornix, without damaging the skin. This case is professionally interesting for both young doctors and experienced specialists in otolaryngology, ophthalmology, maxillofacial surgery and neurosurgery. Experts, analyzing this clinical example, will be able to correctly diagnose, effectively eliminate the inflammatory process in the maxillary sinus.

Ten-year experience with multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of odontogenic sinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic sinusitis is an underdiagnosed entity and is one cause of failure of conventional treatments of sinusitis. Unfortunately, there is no consensus so far on the best management protocol. This retrospective study aimed to suggest a practical management protocol that can reduce misdiagnosis and improve treatment outcomes. METHODS: The study included 74 patients with confirmed odontogenic sinusitis who were diagnosed and treated over 10 years (2010-2019). The patient data were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Dental pain was reported in only 31.1 per cent of patients. Fifty-six patients (75.7 per cent) had received dental treatment during the last year, but only 13 (23.1 per cent) reported it. Dental pathology was missed on initial computed tomography evaluation in 24 patients (32.4 per cent). Forty-one patients (55.4 per cent) were successfully treated by dental procedures and antibiotics. Fourteen patients needed functional endoscopic sinus surgery in addition to dental procedures. CONCLUSION: Successful management of odontogenic sinusitis requires good communication between rhinologists, radiologists and dentists. Dental treatment should be the logical first step in the treatment protocol, unless otherwise indicated.

[COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE SPECIES COMPOSITION AND SENSITIVITY OF MICROFLORA IN PATIENTS WITH ODONTOGENIC MAXILLARY SINUSITIS].

Objective - to study the species composition of microflora and its sensitivity in patients with odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. The study included 230 patients of both sexes aged 18 to 70 years, who were treated at the Moscow Regional Scientifics Research and Clinical Institute named after M. F. Vladimirsky with a diagnosis of Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Of these, there were 155 patients with odontogenic sinusitis, complicated by perforation of the maxillary sinus and the presence of an oro-antral fistula, and 75 patients with maxillary aspergillosis. All patients underwent microbiological examination of smears and flushes from the maxillary sinus cavity with the determination of the species composition and antibiotic sensitivity. In the majority of the patients with perforative forms of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis, coccal flora (streptococci and various species) was detected, in a smaller number compared to it - facultative and obligate anaerobes, pathogenic fungi (Candida). A comparative analysis of the microflora, depending on the duration of the maxillary sinus perforation, showed that the rhinogenic microorganisms (Moraxella spp.) were found only in intraoperative perforations (up to 20% of cases). The presence of obligate anaerobes (Fusobacterium spp. Bacteroides spp.) was typical for long-existing perforations. In patients with maxillary aspergillosis facultative and obligate anaerobes were found less frequently and in a smaller variety than in patients with perforative maxillary sinusitis. There were no cases of sinus contamination by pathogenic fungi of the genus Candida in this group. At the same time, rhinogenic microgranisms (Moraxella spp.) were detected with a higher frequency (up to 27.3%) in this group of patients.

The Combination of Panoramic Imaging and Waters' Projection Contributes to the Diagnosis of Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of adding Waters' projection to panoramic imaging compared with panoramic imaging or Waters' projection alone. Maxillary sinusitis in 106 patients (206 sinuses) was retrospectively assessed with panoramic imaging, Waters' projection, and computed tomography imaging by two oral radiologists. The diagnostic performance was assessed with computed tomography imaging as the gold standard. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve values were obtained. Inter- and intra-observer agreement was quantified using weighted kappa coefficients. Observer A performed the same procedure twice (A1 and A2 for the first and second observations, respectively). The accuracies of observers A1, B, and A2 with combination imaging were 0.699, 0.636, and 0.718, respectively. Their area under the curve values with combination imaging were 0.746, 0.640, and 0.771, respectively. Inter-observer agreement was good for Waters' projection (κ, 0.650), and poor for panoramic imaging (κ, 0281). Intra-observer agreement was good for Waters' projection (κ, 0.752), and moderate for panoramic imaging (κ, 0.597). Panoramic imaging was equivalent to Waters' projection for diagnosing maxillary sinusitis. Combination imaging comprising panoramic imaging and Waters' projection can contribute to the diagnosis of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis because of its high sensitivity.

Diagnosing odontogenic sinusitis of endodontic origin: A multidisciplinary literature review.

PURPOSE: Endodontic disease is one of the most common causes of bacterial odontogenic sinusitis (ODS). Diagnosing ODS of endodontic origin involves otolaryngologists confirming sinusitis, and dental specialists confirming endodontic sources. The purpose of this study was to conduct a multidisciplinary literature review to highlight clinical and microbiological features of ODS, and the most optimal diagnostic modalities to confirm endodontic disease. METHODS: An extensive review of both medical and dental literature was performed by rhinologists, endodontists, and an infectious disease specialist. Frequencies of various clinical and microbiological features from ODS studies were collected, and averages were calculated. Different endodontic testing and imaging modalities were also evaluated on their abilities to confirm endodontic disease. RESULTS: ODS patients most often present with unilateral sinonasal symptoms for over 3 months, purulence on nasal endoscopy, and overt dental pathology on computed tomography (CT). Subjective foul smell, and maxillary sinus cultures demonstrating anaerobes and α-streptococci (viridans group) may be more specific to ODS. For endodontic evaluations, cold pulp testing and cone-beam CT imaging are most optimal for confirming pulpal and periapical disease. CONCLUSION: Diagnosing ODS requires collaboration between otolaryngologists and dental specialists. Clinicians should suspect ODS when patients present with unilateral sinonasal symptoms, especially foul smell. Patients will generally have purulent drainage on nasal endoscopy, and both sinus opacification and overt dental pathology on CT. However, some patients will have subtle or absent dental pathology on CT. For suspected endodontic disease, endodontists should be consulted for at least cold pulp testing, and ideally cone-beam CT.

Comparison of bacterial maxillary sinus cultures between odontogenic sinusitis and chronic rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is distinct from other forms of rhinosinusitis. Diagnosing ODS can be challenging because of nonspecific clinical presentations and underrepresentation in the literature. The purpose of this study was to compare maxillary sinus bacterial cultures between patients with ODS and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), to determine whether certain bacteria are associated with ODS. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of 276 consecutive patients from August 2015 to August 2019 who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for bacterial ODS, CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), or CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). When present, pus was sterilely cultured from maxillary sinuses after maxillary antrostomy, and aerobic and anaerobic cultures were immediately sent for processing. Demographics and culture results were compared between ODS and CRS patients, and then separately between ODS and CRSsNP, and ODS and CRSwNP. ODS culture results were also compared between different dental pathologies (endodontic vs oroantral fistula). RESULTS: The following bacteria were significantly more likely in ODS compared to CRS: mixed anaerobes, Fusobacterium spp., Eikenella corrodens, Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus anginosus, and Streptococcus constellatus. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were inversely related to ODS. There were no significant differences in cultures between the different dental pathologies. CONCLUSION: Certain bacteria were more likely to be associated with ODS compared to CRS when purulence was cultured from the maxillary sinus. Physicians should evaluate for an odontogenic source of sinusitis when these ODS-associated bacteria are identified in maxillary sinus cultures.

Predicting Odontogenic Sinusitis in Unilateral Sinus Disease: A Prospective, Multivariate Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is a common cause of unilateral sinus disease (USD), but can be challenging to diagnose due to nonspecific clinical presentations, potentially subtle to absent dental pathology on sinus computed tomography (CT), and underrepresentation in the sinusitis literature. OBJECTIVE: Identify sinonasal clinical variables predictive of ODS in patients presenting with unilateral maxillary sinus opacification on sinus CT. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 131 consecutive patients with USD and at least partial or complete maxillary sinus opacification on sinus CT. Patients' demographics, sinonasal symptoms (anterior and posterior drainage, nasal obstruction, facial pressure, smell loss, and foul smell), 22-item sinonasal outcome test, nasal endoscopy findings, CT findings, and histopathology were collected. Patients' diagnoses included ODS, chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps, and inverted papilloma. Demographic and clinical data were compared between patients with unilateral ODS and non-odontogenic disease using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of the 131 USD patients, 65 had ODS and 66 had non-odontogenic disease. The following variables were significantly associated with unilateral ODS on multivariate analysis: middle meatal pus on endoscopy (OR= 17.67, 95% CI-5.69, 54.87; p = 0.001), foul smell (OR= 6.11, 95% CI-1.64, 22.82; p=.007), facial pressure (OR= 3.55, 95% CI-1.25, 10.12; p = 0.018), and any frontal opacification on CT (OR= 5.19, 95% CI-1.68, 16.06; p = 0.004). Any sphenoid opacification on CT was inversely related to ODS (OR = 0.14, 95% CI-0.03, 0.69; p = 0.016). The study was adequately powered. CONCLUSION: With unilateral maxillary sinus disease, the following features were significantly associated with ODS: foul smell, ipsilateral facial pressure, middle meatal pus on endoscopy, and any frontal sinus opacification on sinus CT. Additionally, any sphenoid sinus opacification on CT was inversely related to ODS. Presence or absence of these clinical variables can be used to increase or decrease one's suspicion of an odontogenic source of sinusitis.

Images of the month: Cavernous sinus venous thrombosis secondary to Streptococcus milleri maxillary sinusitis: An unusual cause of diplopia and headache.

Cavernous sinus venous thrombosis is an uncommon condition associated with high mortality rates if not recognised early. Symptoms include headache, visual loss, ophthalmoplegia, altered consciousness, proptosis and periorbital oedema. High-quality imaging is critical in early diagnosis and successful management. Primary infection (such as sinusitis) and possible complications (including meningitis) should be considered as potential aetiologies of cavernous sinus venous thrombosis, especially in those with a preceding history of localised infection. We present a case of a 50-year-old man with a bilateral cavernous sinus venous thrombosis with associated meningitis caused by Streptococcus milleri, secondary to maxillary sinusitis and otomastoiditis. He was successfully treated with antimicrobial treatment, surgical drainage and anticoagulation.

Recognizing odontogenic sinusitis: A national survey of otolaryngology chief residents.

PURPOSE: Odontogenic sinusitis is underrepresented in sinusitis literature as well as in the otolaryngology teaching curriculum sponsored by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngologists and residents in training may therefore have a decreased awareness of the condition. The objective of this study was to survey otolaryngology chief residents toward the ends of their training to determine how often they considered odontogenic sinusitis as a cause of unilateral sinus disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online REDCap survey was conducted from December 2018 to January 2019. Online surveys were emailed to 119 Otolaryngology residency program directors in the United States of America, which were then forwarded to their chief residents. Surveys included 3 demographic and 4 clinical questions. Clinical questions included 3 computed tomography-based questions requiring either differential diagnoses or most likely diagnosis, and 1 question on residents' perceived prevalence of odontogenic sinusitis as a cause of unilateral sinus opacification. Answer choices were tabulated and compared based on geographic region and post-residency career plans. RESULTS: Of 293 chief residents emailed, 94 completed the survey (32.1%). While answer choices on imaging-based questions varied, odontogenic sinusitis was generally underrecognized. Approximately 70% of residents felt odontogenic sinusitis represented 0%-40% of unilateral sinus opacification. There were no statistically significant differences in answers based on geographic distribution or post-residency career plans. CONCLUSIONS: Otolaryngology chief residents recognized odontogenic sinusitis with variable accuracy on imaging, and generally underestimated its prevalence as a cause of unilateral sinus opacification. Efforts should be made to teach otolaryngology residents about odontogenic sinusitis.

Dental assessment of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis, aided by Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVES: To identify tooth diseases as potential causative factors in the development of maxillary sinus lesions, with the aid of clinical examination combined with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), in the patients with persistent sinus-like ailments, unresponsive to routine treatment offered by otolaryngologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 44 patients with suspected odontogenic maxillary sinusitis, a dental examination with tooth vitality test was carried out, in conjunction with CBCT. The study involved 29 women and 15 men (age range 19-69 years, mean age 43 (SD = 13.9) years). RESULTS: In 15 (34.1%) patients the odontogenic lesions were encountered in maxillary sinuses. A total of 33 causative teeth were identified, of which 13 (39%) were after root canal treatment (RCT). Only one of the teeth had a properly reconstructed crown, and only one tooth had the root canals properly filled-in. Most frequently, the lesions in the sinuses were attributed to the inflammation of periapical tissues; the first molar having been established as the most common causative tooth. CONCLUSIONS: A detailed dental examination, pursued in conjunction with CBCT analysis, allow to diagnose odontogenic maxillary lesions. The incidence of long-term ailments originating in the maxillary sinuses should prompt a detailed assessment of the teeth, especially those after RCT.

Case Report: A Rare Case of Silent Sinus Syndrome and Vertical Diplopia.

SIGNIFICANCE: Silent sinus syndrome is classically a maxillary sinus disease characterized by transient and variable vertical diplopia, hypoglobus, and enophthalmos. Uncommon presentations may exist, and although rare, it should be considered when diagnostic testing is inconsistent with more common etiologies of diplopia. PURPOSE: This study aimed to report an unusual presentation of silent sinus syndrome and review the thought process in diagnosing and managing this condition. CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old white man presented to the eye clinic with left upper eyelid ptosis and intermittent vertical diplopia of 2-month onset. Clinical testing was variable, and initial differential diagnoses included a partial left pupil-sparing third nerve palsy involving the superior division, myasthenia gravis, and orbital disease. After extensive workup and review of his computed tomography images, the patient was diagnosed with severe chronic pansinusitis with an underlying condition known as silent sinus syndrome. He was referred to otorhinolaryngology for sinus decompression and oculoplastics for orbital reconstruction. While awaiting orbital reconstruction after decompression of multiple sinuses, he returned reporting a significant reduction in his diplopia. CONCLUSIONS: Vertical diplopia is a common complaint in primary care optometry. It is important to delve into more rare etiologies when clinical, laboratory, and radiological studies do not support the more common diagnoses.